Public AI product

MetaSculpt AI

Krystian co-founded and shipped a public AI product spanning prompt tracking, citation capture, crawl analysis, weekly reports, and Schema JSON generation.

Public Work Shipped 2024 - 2025
MetaSculpt interface showing an action brief, visibility chart, account navigation, and login surface
Public MetaSculpt interface. I co-founded the product and owned AI workflow design, crawler and reporting logic, documentation, and code review with a co-founder.
  1. Crawl
  2. Generate
  3. Validate
  4. Fix
The shipped product kept crawl collection, structured generation, validation, and corrective action in separate stages.

Exact role

Co-Founder (technical lead)

Current status

Shipped

2024 - 2025

Problem

What needed to change

People trying to compete in AI search needed a practical way to track visibility in AI-generated answers, understand which prompts mentioned them, compare competitor citations, and add useful Schema JSON to their sites.

Users

Who the system serves

Site owners, marketers, and AI-search visibility teams trying to understand why they appeared or failed to appear in GPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI-answer surfaces.

Team context

Where I fit

Two-person company. Product and technical decisions were shared with a co-founder; Krystian owned AI workflow design, crawler and reporting logic, documentation, and code review.

Important technical decision

Krystian separated crawler and generator responsibilities and organized the product around a Crawl → Generate → Validate → Fix flow.

Tradeoff or limitation

A Wasp frontend template was the starting point. The product shipped publicly but did not gain user traction, so the verified result is delivery rather than adoption.

Implementation

What I personally owned

  • Owned the AI workflow design, crawler logic, prompt tracking, experiment setup, weekly reporting, documentation, and code review with a co-founder.
  • Used a Wasp frontend template as the starting point, then implemented the product workflow, data capture, report logic, and AI-search analysis around it.
  • Shared product and technical decisions with the co-founder.

Constraints

Hard parts that shaped the work

  • The weekly report had to combine search checks from GPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with cleaned results, mentions, citations, and recurring competitors.
  • Competitor crawl results had to remain comparable with the user pages being evaluated.
  • Prompt results, citations, competitors, crawl findings, and site changes had to fit one readable recurring report.

Shipped result

What exists now

  • Prompt and experiment tracking with competitor and citation capture.
  • Crawler-backed site comparison and weekly insight reports.
  • Schema JSON generation and validation.

Result

Verified result and current state

  • The complete workflow shipped publicly.
  • The product did not ultimately gain user traction; the verified result is delivery, not adoption.

Technical scope

Tools used

OpenAI APIGemini APISchema.orgREST APIsStructured metadataValidation workflowsWaspTypeScriptDocker